We are halfway into 2019 and Straus Meyers, LLP has scored another defense verdict. In the hours before trial, defense agreed to accept opposing counsel’s previous offer to settle. However, the offer was rejected and, in fact, met with an increased demand. Trial proceeded accordingly. Although liability was adverse and the “intoxicated” defendant was alleged to have intentionally struck plaintiff’s vehicle, the Court ultimately found in defendant’s favor. According to trial counsel Marvin Straus, not only is it important to understand all of your defenses, it is just as critical to understand plaintiff’s burden of proof and the necessary evidence required to meet that burden. A motion for judgment was timely made and ultimately granted pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, section 631.8.